Is A Motor Bike A Vehicle? Understanding Motorcycle Classification And What It Means For Motor Laminations And Design

Yes. A motor bike—also called a motorcycle—is a vehicle in both legal and practical terms. Lawmakers, transportation agencies, and insurers treat motorcycles as motor vehicles alongside cars and trucks. That simple answer carries a long list of implications for licensing, registration, insurance, safety standards, taxes, and emissions rules. If you design or procure electric motor components for motorcycles, those rules shape your engineering decisions too. Materials, lamination thickness, manufacturing method, and assembly approach all ripple back to cost, performance, and compliance.

In this expert guide, I’ll lay out the legal classification clearly, then pivot to the engineering fundamentals that govern core loss and efficiency in motorcycle traction motors. You’ll see how material selection and manufacturing processes trade off. You’ll leave with a practical checklist you can use with your lamination supplier. Consider this your Problem–Explain–Guide–Empower roadmap.

Problem: You need to confirm whether a motor bike is a “vehicle” and understand what that means for design decisions. The classification drives requirements for licensing, registration, insurance, equipment, emissions, and safety. Those requirements flow into engineering choices in the motor core, stator and rotor laminations, coatings, and stack construction.

Explain: We’ll translate legal definitions into plain language. Then we’ll unpack eddy currents, hysteresis, permeability, and coercivity. You’ll see how lamination thickness and coating strategies reduce loss and heat.

Guide: We’ll compare materials like non‑oriented silicon steels, high‑frequency grades, and cobalt alloys. We’ll weigh manufacturing options such as stamping and laser cutting. We’ll discuss interlocking vs bonding vs welding stacks. Each option comes with strengths and tradeoffs.

Empower: You’ll get selection heuristics by application—commuter scooters, performance sportbikes, off‑road dirt bikes, and prototypes—and a concise procurement checklist. This will set you up for a productive conversation with your lamination partner.

In short, clarity over complexity. Let’s get to the point then build depth methodically.

What Counts as a “Vehicle” in Law and Practice
Why a Motor Bike Is a Vehicle
Practical Implications: Licensing, Registration, Insurance, Safety, Taxes, and Emissions
Differentiating Motorcycles from Mopeds, Scooters, E‑Bikes, Trikes, and Off‑Road Machines
Engineering Fundamentals: Core Losses, Eddy Currents, and Why Laminations Matter
Materials and Manufacturing Options for Motorcycle Motor Laminations
Best‑Fit Guidance by Application
Procurement Checklist and Risk Management
Your Engineering Takeaway and Next Steps

What Constitutes a “Vehicle” in Modern Legal and Practical Terms?

Legal systems define “vehicle” to manage how we use roads safely and fairly. Across jurisdictions, the core elements look similar.

Core Characteristics of a Vehicle

Designed to carry persons or goods on land
Has a means of propulsion such as an internal combustion engine or an electric motor
Intended for operation on public roads or designated areas, even if some subclasses operate off road
Identified by a unique Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) when it is road legal
Subject to road user rules, tax systems, and registration frameworks

Engineers often ask for a “signal” version. Here it is. If it is self‑propelled, carries people or cargo, and operates on public roads, lawmakers will call it a motor vehicle. A motorcycle fits that definition cleanly.

Distinctions from Other Categories

Bicycles are typically non‑motorized and occupy a different legal bucket
Pedestrian mobility devices occupy yet another category
Stationary structures do not qualify
Electric bicycles (e‑bikes) blur the lines, yet most laws set wattage and speed thresholds that keep many e‑bikes out of “motor vehicle” status

These differences matter for your design because certification scope, testing burden, and cost change with classification.

The Definitive Status: Why a Motor Bike Is a Vehicle

Universal Fit to Vehicle Criteria

A motorcycle carries a rider and often a passenger. It may carry cargo through saddlebags or racks. It propels itself with an engine or motor. Manufacturers design it for road use under traffic laws. That ticks every vehicle box.

Street‑legal dirt bikes and dual‑sport motorcycles show this clearly. They operate on highways and public roads with the right equipment installed. Off‑road motorcycles operate away from highways by design, yet lawmakers still call them motor vehicles even if not street legal.

Official Legal Classifications

DMV and DOT definitions: State Departments of Motor Vehicles define “motorcycle,” “moped,” and “scooter” within broader “motor vehicle” categories. Some definitions pivot on engine displacement or power, often at thresholds like 50 cc or top speed limits. You will see “powered two‑wheelers” used by transport departments and safety agencies
Vehicle codes and statutes: In the United States, vehicle codes at the state level include motorcycles in the definition of “motor vehicle.” California Vehicle Code and New York Vehicle and Traffic Law do this explicitly. In the United Kingdom, the Road Traffic Act 1988 defines “motor bicycle” as a motor vehicle with fewer than four wheels. Canada’s provincial vehicle acts follow the same logic. Australia and many Asian jurisdictions do as well
International frameworks: The European Union classifies motorcycles and mopeds in the L‑category vehicles under Regulation (EU) No 168/2013. UN ECE regulations provide harmonized technical prescriptions for lighting, braking, and other systems on L‑category vehicles

If you design a powertrain for a motorcycle you design a motor vehicle subsystem. That moves you into the realm of transportation standards and audits. Treat that early in your plan.

Critical Implications of Motorcycle Vehicle Classification

Legal status drives your obligation set. Riders feel it at the DMV counter. Engineers feel it through compliance and cost.

Licensing Requirements

Most jurisdictions require a motorcycle endorsement or specialized license such as Class M or A
Age restrictions apply, along with tiering by power‑to‑weight in some countries
Some states or countries mandate training courses through organizations such as the Motorcycle Safety Foundation
Learner permits, provisional licenses, and graduated licensing show up in local law

Your design must consider rider skill and training norms. High power density motors need smooth torque control to protect new riders and satisfy regulatory safety cases.

Registration and Titling

A motorcycle requires official registration with a transport department for road use
It carries a vehicle title and a unique VIN
It must display a license plate as defined by state regulations
Registration renewal and transfer rules apply at sale

VIN traceability ripples into your component traceability and PPAP documentation. Expect to document material origin, process control, and revision history for critical parts.

Insurance Obligations

Liability insurance is mandatory in most U.S. states. Some states allow proof of financial responsibility instead
Similar requirements exist in the UK, EU, Canada, and Australia
Insurers classify motorcycles as motor vehicles with distinct risk models which leads to different premiums than cars

That risk model rewards safer designs. Better thermal control, stable torque response, and robust electrical insulation reduce failure rates. This can support lower total cost of ownership for fleet users.

Adherence to Traffic Laws and Safety Regulations

Motorcycles must follow speed limits, traffic signals, road signs, and parking rules
Helmet laws vary by jurisdiction yet apply widely
Lane filtering or lane splitting has mixed legal status by jurisdiction
Manufacturing must comply with safety standards for lighting, braking, tires, and controls. In the U.S., NHTSA’s Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards apply to motorcycles. In the EU, type approval under L‑category requires compliance with UNECE regulations
Noise regulations and exhaust rules apply to internal combustion motorcycles. Electric motorcycles face different acoustic rules yet must satisfy electromagnetic compatibility and other safety directives

Your e‑motor design must satisfy functional safety expectations and EMC limits. That affects inverter switching strategies, cable shielding, and magnetic core design.

Taxation and Fees

Sales tax or VAT applies at purchase
Registration fees and annual excise or road taxes apply depending on jurisdiction
Some regions offer rebates or credits for electric motorcycles

Cost of compliance is part of the business case. Efficient laminations that shrink copper usage and reduce cooling burden can free budget elsewhere.

Environmental and Emissions Standards

The Environmental Protection Agency sets emission standards for motorcycles with combustion engines. States can add rules
Electric motorcycles avoid tailpipe emissions yet must meet safety and EMC rules. Battery and electronics introduce separate compliance needs
Some jurisdictions require periodic inspections for emissions or roadworthiness

A cooler, more efficient motor improves range and battery life. It also lowers thermal stress on surrounding components which helps during inspections and prolongs service life.

Differentiating Motorcycles from Closely Related Two‑Wheeled Devices

Classification differences change the engineering and regulatory context.

Mopeds and Scooters

Mopeds often have smaller engines or motors and lower top speeds than motorcycles. Many laws set thresholds around 50 cc or 30–45 km/h
Scooters may require the same motorcycle license, or lighter rules if they meet moped criteria
Some scooters with higher power fall squarely under full motorcycle rules

Lower speed duty cycles shift optimal lamination thickness and material choice. You can exploit lower frequency losses and favor cost.

Electric Bicycles and Pedal‑Assist Bikes

E‑bikes usually sit outside “motor vehicle” classification if they meet limits on motor wattage and assisted top speed
Faster or more powerful e‑bikes can cross into moped or motorcycle definitions
E‑bikes face a different certification stack focused on consumer product safety and bicycle standards

If your design target is an e‑bike you optimize at lighter flux density and higher switching frequency. If your design target crosses into moped territory you step into vehicle rules and procure accordingly.

Three‑Wheeled Vehicles: Autocycles and Trikes

Autocycles and trikes sit in a mixed space. Some jurisdictions treat them as motorcycles. Others place them in a separate class that may allow a car license
Seat configuration, controls, and safety equipment often drive classification

Packaging constraints differ which changes slot geometry and thermal paths in the motor. Plan material and stack strategy with that envelope in mind.

Off‑Road Vehicles: Dirt Bikes, ATVs, and UTVs

Off‑road motorcycles are motor vehicles yet not street legal without specific equipment
ATVs and UTVs sit in their own classes. Many jurisdictions limit their road access
Duty cycles are harsh which stresses thermal management and mechanical robustness

Off‑road vibration and mud ingress drive you toward tougher stack bonding, higher coating durability, and secure end‑lamination retention features.

Engineering Fundamentals: Core Losses, Eddy Currents, and Why Laminations Matter

Now the physics behind your design choices. If you already know this, skim for the analogies and checklists.

Magnetic materials resist changes to their magnetization. Every time your stator flips the magnetic field to drive torque the core pays a price. That “price” shows up as core loss which turns into heat. Core loss has two main components.

Hysteresis loss: Energy lost because the material’s magnetic domains do not flip for free. Think of pushing a heavy file cabinet that sticks a bit each time you change direction. Hysteresis grows with frequency and with the area of the B‑H loop. Materials with low coercivity waste less energy
Eddy current loss: Energy lost when changing magnetic fields induce circulating currents in the metal. Picture small whirlpools forming in a river eddy. These currents heat the steel. Eddy loss grows roughly with the square of lamination thickness, the square of peak flux density, and the square of electrical frequency

Laminations cut those whirlpools down to size. Thin sheets of electrical steel with an insulating coating block current paths through the stack. That reduces eddy currents dramatically which slashes heat. You still carry hysteresis loss, yet you can reduce it with higher grade materials that have lower coercivity and tailored grain structure.

Key definitions in plain terms:

Magnetic permeability: How readily a material “conducts” magnetic flux. Imagine how easily a sponge soaks up water
Coercivity: The material’s resistance to being demagnetized. Lower coercivity means lower hysteresis loss
Saturation flux density: The point where the material cannot carry more flux without a steep cost. You want a comfortable margin for peak torque
Stacking factor: The fraction of a stack’s thickness that is actual steel not insulation. A higher stacking factor gives more magnetic cross section for the same package

Electrical frequency in a traction motor equals mechanical speed times the number of pole pairs. A 10‑pole interior‑permanent‑magnet rotor at 6,000 rpm sees 5 pole pairs which yields 500 Hz electrical frequency. That pushes you toward thinner laminations and low‑loss grades. Commuter scooters with fewer poles or lower speeds see lower frequency which lets you relax thickness a bit.

Thermal paths matter. Heat from core loss adds to copper loss and mechanical loss. That heat flows through the stator yoke and the housing. If laminations reduce core loss you ease cooling requirements and extend life for motor windings, magnets, and bearings. Lower temperatures also help you meet reliability targets and safety cases.

You must also control torque ripple and noise. Skewing the stator slots or rotor magnets reduces cogging torque and acoustic noise. That choice affects stamping complexity and scrap. It can also change lamination alignment features and bonding patterns.

If you want a quick reference on lamination families and their role in machines see this overview of electrical steel laminations.

Your Options Explained: Materials and Processes for Motorcycle Motor Laminations

You have two buckets to weigh: material considerations and manufacturing plus assembly processes.

Material Considerations

Non‑oriented silicon steels

These are the workhorses for rotating machines. You will see M‑grades like M19, M27, M36 in North America and equivalent grades elsewhere
Pros: Balanced performance in all directions, good availability, wide coating options, cost effective for general‑purpose traction motors
Cons: At higher frequencies you need thinner gauges and better coatings which raises cost
Best for: General motorcycles and scooters running moderate electrical frequencies. Commuter use, delivery fleets, mid‑power BLDC and PMSM machines

High‑frequency electrical steels

Specialty non‑oriented grades with very low loss at 400–800 Hz and beyond. Thin gauges down to 0.18–0.27 mm are common
Pros: Lower core loss at high electrical frequencies. Better for compact high‑speed motors
Cons: Higher cost, tighter stamping requirements, more sensitive to heat‑affected zones
Best for: Light yet powerful sportbike traction motors and compact scooters with high pole count

Cobalt alloys

Cobalt‑iron alloys raise saturation flux density and can carry more flux in the same cross section
Pros: Higher power density and better performance at elevated temperatures
Cons: Very expensive and challenging to process. Not always necessary for motorcycles unless you push extreme performance or temperature
Best for: High‑power‑density applications where every millimeter and gram matters

Amorphous and nanocrystalline ribbons

These materials shine in transformers and some high‑frequency applications due to extremely low core loss
Pros: Exceptional loss characteristics
Cons: Difficult to stamp into complex geometries. Mechanical properties can be limiting in rotating machines
Best for: Rare specialty motor topologies. Not common in motorcycle traction motors today

Powdered iron and soft magnetic composites

3D flux paths become easier with SMCs which can help in axial flux motors
Pros: Isotropic properties and shapes that laminations cannot achieve easily
Cons: Lower permeability and higher loss versus the best electrical steels at moderate frequencies
Best for: Axial flux machines with tight packaging where SMC advantages outweigh loss

Insulation coatings on laminations

Organic and inorganic coatings insulate each sheet and raise interlaminar resistance. Higher class coatings withstand higher temperatures and bonding processes
Choose coatings that match your bonding or interlocking method and your operating temperature. Verify dielectric strength, friction, and weldability where needed

Applicable standards and test methods

ASTM A677 and IEC 60404 series define properties and test methods for electrical steels
Epstein frame and single sheet tester methods quantify core loss and B‑H curves
Require lot‑specific test reports and ensure supplier labs follow recognized methods

Manufacturing and Assembly Processes

Stamping

The production workhorse for high volumes. Progressive dies deliver speed and consistency
Pros: High throughput, excellent repeatability, lower cost at scale
Cons: Tooling cost, die maintenance, burr management, and careful control of grain damage
Use die design, fine‑blanking strategies, and post‑stamp stress relief where necessary. Inspect burr height and edge quality rigorously

Laser cutting

Ideal for prototyping, design changes, and lower volumes. Great for complex geometries and quick iterations
Pros: No hard tooling, fast design‑to‑part cycle, precise features
Cons: Heat‑affected zones raise local core loss. You mitigate with post‑cut annealing and careful parameter selection
Best for: Development builds, pilot runs, and complex IPM pocket shapes before you commit to tooling

Wire EDM and waterjet

EDM delivers high precision without heat‑affected zones at the cut edge. Waterjet avoids thermal damage as well
Pros: Excellent edge quality and geometry control
Cons: Slower and more expensive than stamping for volume
Best for: Premium prototypes and small runs where performance matters more than unit cost

Interlocking, bonding, and welding stacks

Interlocking laminations: Mechanically formed tabs lock sheets like LEGO bricks. No adhesive or weld heat needed
Pros: Fast and cost effective. No thermal damage from welding
Cons: Tabs alter local flux and may slightly reduce stacking factor
Bonding with adhesive: Builds a rigid stack with uniform pressure distribution and damping
Pros: Excellent mechanical integrity and NVH benefits
Cons: Requires adhesive curing steps and careful coating compatibility
TIG or laser welding: Simple and strong for end‑locking or for attaching features
Pros: Familiar and robust
Cons: Heat can degrade local magnetic properties. Use minimal heat input and validate loss impact

Skew and alignment

Skewed stacks reduce cogging torque and acoustic noise
Stamping skewed laminations or building skew by segment shift increases complexity. It can raise scrap and introduce new alignment tolerances
Validate skew benefits with electromagnetic and NVH analysis before committing

Rotor specifics

Interior permanent magnet (IPM) rotors need precise magnet pockets, bridges, and webs. Edge quality and burrs can affect mechanical strength at high speed
Surface permanent magnet (SPM) rotors use retaining sleeves or adhesive systems. Thermal expansion and mechanical retention lead the design risk
Balance the rotor dynamically after final assembly. Control stack height tolerance tightly to preserve the air gap concentricity
For a focused view of rotor details see this primer on rotor core lamination

Stator specifics

Slot geometry drives winding fill, copper loss, and thermal paths. Tooth tip shape affects torque ripple and iron loss
Insulation systems must survive thermal cycling and vibration typical of motorcycles
Coolant jacket design and potting strategy influence heat removal and NVH
For stator‑side considerations start with stator core lamination

Bringing it all together

Your stack quality and material choice determine the baseline efficiency of the traction motor. The inverter and control strategy build on that foundation
For an overview that ties stator and rotor together check motor core laminations

Which Application Is This For? Best‑Fit Guidance

Match the engineering choice to the use case. You will avoid both under‑engineering and overspend.

City commuter scooter

Duty: Low to moderate speeds, frequent stop‑start, high uptime in urban heat
Material: Non‑oriented silicon steel in mid‑grade with thickness around 0.3–0.5 mm depending on pole count and speed
Process: Stamping for volume. Interlocking or bonding based on NVH targets
Design notes: Favor robust insulation coatings and conservative flux density to limit heat in traffic. Optimize slot fill for copper efficiency

Mid‑power motorcycle for general commuting

Duty: Moderate speed highways, mixed urban use
Material: Low‑loss non‑oriented steel in thinner gauges near 0.27–0.35 mm
Process: Stamping with post‑stamp stress relief if loss targets require. Bonding improves NVH
Design notes: Skew to reduce cogging. Manage torque ripple to protect drivability in wet or low traction

Performance sportbike

Duty: High power density, elevated rpm, aggressive duty cycles
Material: High‑frequency non‑oriented steel in thin gauges. Evaluate cobalt‑iron only if saturation limits block your torque and packaging
Process: Tight control over burrs and heat‑affected zones. Bonded stacks for stiffness and NVH. Dynamic rotor balancing is non‑negotiable
Design notes: Validate mechanical stress in rotor bridges at peak speed and over‑speed. Confirm magnet temperature limits under track duty

Off‑road dirt bike

Duty: High shock and vibration, mud and dust, repeated tip‑overs
Material: Tough coatings with high dielectric strength and abrasion resistance. Mid‑loss grades can work if speeds are lower
Process: Bonding or interlocking with robust end retention. Protective potting where feasible
Design notes: Overbuild mechanical features that face impact or debris. Ensure cooling paths do not clog easily

Prototype or low‑volume specialty

Duty: Variable yet time to market matters
Material: Start with accessible low‑loss grades to get data fast
Process: Laser cutting or EDM for rapid iterations then shift to stamping later
Design notes: Plan for tooling from the start. Keep datum schemes and features consistent to ease the transition

Procurement Checklist and Risk Management

Treat the lamination stack as a critical safety‑related item. Document it like one.

Specifications

Material grade and gauge with standards references such as ASTM A677 or IEC 60404
Core loss and B‑H curve targets at specified frequency and flux density. Include test method and acceptance criteria
Insulation coating type, class, dielectric strength, and temperature rating
Lamination thickness tolerance, flatness, burr height maximum, and edge quality
Stack height tolerance, stacking factor target, and surface finish requirements
Skew angle and alignment features where applicable

Manufacturing controls

Die maintenance plan and inspection intervals for stamping. Document sharpening cycles and dimensional drift limits
Laser cutting parameters if used. Require post‑cut anneal when loss impact is material
Stress relief anneal recipes when needed. Define atmosphere, time, and temperature with allowable deviations
Bonding adhesive type, cure schedule, coverage control, and QC checkpoints
Interlock feature geometry and pullout strength acceptance tests
Weld parameters if you spot weld end plates. Constrain heat input and location away from flux critical paths

Quality assurance

First article inspection reports with full dimensional layouts
Lot‑level core loss and B‑H verification on Epstein or single sheet tester
Cpk targets for key dimensions and burr height
Traceability from coil to finished stack with heat numbers and coating lots
Non‑destructive testing for delamination or bond voids when bonding is used
Dynamic balance reports for rotor assemblies

Compliance and documentation

Motorcycles must meet NHTSA FMVSS or EU L‑category technical prescriptions for lighting, brakes, and other systems. The e‑motor sits under the broader type approval umbrella. Align with your system integrator on evidence packages and design assurance
EMC testing for the drivetrain system will stress your control strategy. Core design influences switching choices through loss and temperature margins
Environmental compliance such as RoHS and REACH for materials and coatings
Safety cases and DFMEAs that reference lamination risks such as rotor burst or stator short‑to‑core events

Supplier engagement

Share duty cycle and electrical frequency targets. Your supplier will help tune lamination thickness and grades
Ask for alternatives with quantified tradeoffs so you can change course quickly if cost or availability shifts
Validate process changes with a controlled build. Require a deviation process for any unapproved material or method changes

Service and end‑of‑life

Consider recyclability of electrical steels and adhesives
Plan for repair scenarios. Bonded stacks complicate disassembly yet improve NVH and integrity. Decide early which matters more in your market

Your Engineering Takeaway and Next Steps

You came in asking a simple question. Is a motor bike a vehicle. The answer is yes. That legal reality drives licensing, registration, insurance, traffic laws, taxes, and environmental rules across jurisdictions. It also sets expectations for manufacturing and safety standards that your design must respect.

Your key technical insights

Laminations are not optional. They are the primary tool to cut eddy currents and core loss which lowers heat and boosts efficiency
Hysteresis and eddy losses scale differently with frequency, flux, and thickness. Match lamination gauge and grade to your electrical frequency and packaging limits
Material choice is contextual. Non‑oriented silicon steels serve most motorcycles. High‑frequency grades unlock compact, high‑speed designs. Cobalt alloys are niche and expensive
Manufacturing method changes performance and cost. Stamping rules volume. Laser and EDM speed development and preserve edge quality. Bonding improves NVH. Interlocking speeds assembly
Application dictates priorities. Commuters value cost and durability. Sportbikes demand power density. Dirt bikes need rugged stacks with secure retention and coatings that survive grit
Quality and compliance live upstream. Specify test methods, control burrs and stresses, and document traceability. Align early with type approval requirements

Practical next steps

Pin down your electrical frequency range from pole count and rpm
Set core loss targets at operating flux densities. Use standard test methods
Shortlist two lamination grades at different thicknesses and request sample data
Choose a manufacturing route for the current phase. Laser cut for prototypes then plan stamping for volume
Decide on stack assembly: interlock for cost and speed or bonding for NVH and stiffness
Build a pilot stack and validate temperature rise, torque ripple, and NVH under a representative duty cycle
Lock specs and proceed to tooling with a clear PPAP and inspection plan

If you want a quick refresher on how stator, rotor, and full core stacks come together you can start with stator core lamination, review rotor core lamination, then zoom out to motor core laminations. These resources give you the vocabulary and checkpoints you need for a constructive discussion with your supplier.

Final note on classification keywords and contexts you may encounter

Departments like the DMV and transport authorities define motorcycle vs moped vs scooter in vehicle codes. They use thresholds like engine displacement, motor power, top speed, and wheel count
You will hear about motorbike registration requirements, license plate rules, vehicle title and VIN norms, and motorcycle insurance classification
Safety and traffic laws include helmet rules, lane splitting or filtering where permitted, and standard road user obligations under traffic laws and vehicle codes
Emissions standards for ICE motorcycles come from agencies like EPA. Electric motorcycles shift focus to EMC and functional safety. Manufacturing standards touch Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards in the U.S. and L‑category requirements in the EU
International coverage includes UK law under the Road Traffic Act, EU L‑category vehicles, Australian road rules, and Canadian provincial vehicle acts
Related vehicles such as electric bicycles, mopeds, scooters, autocycles, trikes, ATVs, UTVs, sidecar motorcycles, and off‑road dirt bikes appear in neighboring classes. Designs cross those boundaries which changes legal obligations and design priorities
Specialty categories such as vintage, antique, historical, collector, or restored motorcycles have unique registration paths. They still face core safety rules on public roads
For engineering, all of this adds up to one thing. Your motorcycle is a motor vehicle. Build your motor laminations to meet that reality with the right material, process, documentation, and tests

You design for performance and safety. You procure for consistency and delivery. Together those choices produce a motorcycle that rides well, lasts longer, and passes muster with regulators and riders alike.

Count of internal links in this article: 4

All internal links are unique and used once each.

Is a Motor Bike a Vehicle? Understanding Motorcycle Classification and What It Means for Motor Laminations and Design

In This Article